TED - Three Word Address

영어학원에서 스피치로 진행했습니다. 주제는 TED -  A precise, three-word address for every place on earth

---

Three Word Address Is Not Better Than the Other Address System

 

 Food, clothing, and shelter are necessary things in our life. We called these to the necessities of life. We cannot live without shelter. As what Chris Sheldrick, the speaker of the speech, said about, there are still billions of people are living without an address. Without an address, it means that they are not recognized as the member of society. To solve this address-less problems, he made new address system, the Three Word Address. However, I found several problems of this Three Word address.

  As you can see, Three Word Address’ system is quite simple. They divided the world into three meter squares, and named just any three words to the 57 trillion three meter squares. I found the biggest problem in the basic idea of this. They are easily confused. There are 6 methods to align three words. Also, they names three words in random. So, if we confused our three word address and delivered something to the other address, that could be in the Antarctica or some other continents.

  I found this academy’s three word address, and they said it’s “십일월, 계신다, 낙지.” Chris Sheldrick said they made this system to provide to the people who don’t have address. However, as what I did, we have to type our origin address to find our three word address. And it means, it doesn’t work to the people who don’t have address. Three word address is out of the point. Also, there could be several three word addresses in same building. 3 meter square is not that big to cover every size of building, and it must be the problem when we deliver something.

  If we want to use three word address in our real life, we have to get government’s permission. And I don’t think that they could get the permission. It’s because people don’t know what it is. Even Facebook took 10 years to get 1 billion users. However, there are still many people who don’t do Facebook. Even if the three word address become popular, I think governments would use the street address. There are more disadvantages than merits about acceptation the three word address.

  I love his attempt to make society’s address system better, but I think there are still many problems to accept it. Korea has changed our address system recently, too, so people are still confused about the previous one and the nowadays’ one. And I think this three word system is just aggravating our confusion.

---

서론 

TED, Chris Sheldrick 의 의견을 인용해 관객들이 화자의 주장과 그의 의견을 비교하기 쉽게 만듦. 관객들이 이미 알고 있는 내용을 말함으로써 스피치 내용의 진입장벽이 높지 않음을 암시. 마지막에 화자의 주장 강조.

본론 

1. As you can see 를 도입에 써 관객들이 집중할 수 있게함. 가장 기본적인 아이디어에서 찾아낸 문제점으로 시작. "헷갈리기 쉽다". 가장 근본적인 문제점임.  

2. 관객이 있는 장소를 검색함으로써 집중하게끔 만듦. Chris Sheldrick이 이 시스템을 만들어낸 "이유"에서 오류가 났음을 설명. 모순적인 문제임. 본론에 4가지 주장을 넣고 싶었지만 3가지로 제한했으므로 2번째 주장에 짤막하게 덧붙임. 배송 관련 문제임.

3.  가장 현실적이고 직관적인 문제를 제시. 일반 시민인 '나'의 경험을 얘기함으로써 공감층을 형성하도록 함. 유명한 SNS인 Facebook의 실제 사례를 인용함으로써 화자의 주장에 신뢰성을 더함. 가장 마지막에 화자의 주장이 가득 담긴 말을 함으로써 주장을 단단히 굳힘.

결론

본론을 되짚되, 너무 길게 끌지 않을 것을 원칙으로 함. 애초에 좋은 의도로 만들어진 three word address이므로 너무 비판하지 않고, 그의 의견에 동조하는 자세를 내보여 화자의 이미지를 굳힘.